Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley appears by her choice to reject a ballot proposition to repeal the state’s 2011 casino legislation. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have been waging war against the expansion on every battlefront possible. They’ve had wins and losings across the state, nonetheless they’ve always made their case. Now, they’re hoping that the highest court in Massachusetts gives them one final chance to place the matter before voters.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments week that is last the question of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can show up on the statewide ballot in November. The move would basically create a referendum on whether gambling enterprises could be built one which could disrupt the procedure even if it absolutely was to ultimately fail.
State Believes Implied Contracts Would Be Violated By Repeal
That disruption ended up being one of this main arguments made by attorneys for hawaii, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, who rejected the petition it was unconstitutional because she felt. According to Coakley, such a repeal would affect the ‘implied contracts’ between casino license applicants and the state gambling commission. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally taken away without any settlement for the casino businesses.
Coakley made remarks at a breakfast forum Подробнее →